MUTUAL CONFIDENTIALITY
YOUR IDEA DESERVES RESPECT.
The initial application should give KHARAS enough information to
understand the project without requiring you to disclose confidential
formulas, proprietary processes, trade secrets or other highly
sensitive information.
01
BEGIN WITH THE IDEA, NOT THE SECRETS.
During the initial review, we need to understand the problem, the
people the product should serve, the desired outcome and the general
nature of the proposed application.
You should be able to explain why the project matters without
disclosing the private details that make your approach unique.
02
DEEPER DISCOVERY MAY REQUIRE PROTECTION.
If KHARAS believes there may be a fit and a deeper discovery
conversation is appropriate, a formal mutual confidentiality
agreement may be used before detailed confidential information is
exchanged.
The website and initial application are not themselves substitutes
for a legal confidentiality agreement.
03
CONFIDENTIALITY WORKS BOTH WAYS.
KHARAS may also share nonpublic information about development methods,
product architecture, technical approaches, internal systems,
business strategies or future product ideas.
When a mutual confidentiality agreement is appropriate, its purpose
is to protect both sides—not only the applicant.
04
YOUR PROTECTED INFORMATION REMAINS YOURS.
If KHARAS decides not to accept a project, KHARAS will not use
confidential information disclosed during protected discussions as a
basis to build that applicant’s confidential idea for itself or
another client.
The goal is to allow an honest evaluation without treating access to
an applicant’s protected information as an opportunity.
WHAT IF KHARAS IS ALREADY WORKING IN A SIMILAR SPACE?
Occasionally, KHARAS may already be developing, researching, discussing
or planning a product, feature or solution in the same general space as
an applicant’s idea.
If we identify a meaningful overlap before deeper discovery, we want to
be transparent about it early. Both sides can then determine whether the
applicant’s project is genuinely distinct, whether the concept should
be adjusted, whether a different implementation would create sufficient
separation, or whether it is better not to continue.